Is England Smarter Than France? You Be The Judge
From the current C|Net news, and interesting article that proves governments can, at least some of the time, come to their senses:

A committee of Parliament members has called for a full review of the U.K.’s involvement in the European Galileo satellite-network project.
In a statement released on Monday, Gwyneth Dunwoody, chairperson of the Transport Sub-Committee in Parliament, said that it would be “folly” for the U.K. to pursue the project until a review is completed.
The cost of Galileo was planned to be $4.38 billion but the Transport Sub-Committee believes that this could spiral to $20.73 billion.
The European Commission “is poised to spend billions in taxpayers’ money on a satellite system, without any realistic assessment of its costs and benefits,” Dunwoody said. “We must have independent and up-to-date evidence that proceeding with Galileo is worthwhile.”…
Indeed! Welcome to planet Earth, Ms. Dunwoody, the rest of us have been here all along. I’ve written a number of times (here, here and here for a few samples) about the insanity of the Galileo project and the way my mind is boggled at how people way more educated than I and way more experienced in business and government than I can not seem to make the most rudimentary cost/benefit analysis.

