VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Nov. 14 (UPI) — Police in British Columbia are testing an innovative new mobile system to scanned vehicle license plates.
The new system can be used to track everything from traffic law violators to terrorists… Full Article Here
yes it can be used to track all those ‘persons of interest’ … and more, actually. Read the full article and note the little sort of throw away paragraph at the end … stationary systems are being used at some border crossing points. Now is I were a Canadian one of the things I’d worry about is my shopping. It’s no secret that thousands of Canadians who live close to the US border routinely drive across to by food, booze and even gasoline. It’s been an accepted practice for years … but now each time their car passes the border it will be automatically tallied … who knows how many trips it will take before the tax man is automatically notified to wake up and take notice.
We’ve been talking quite a bit lately about the implications of GPS tracking on personal freedoms and privacy … even about professor Dobson’s “GeoSlavery” presentations. There is of course something to be said on both sides of the issue. Advocates may be pushing the technology too strongly and trampling rights. GPS-phobes may be genning up one too many conspiracy theories and forgetting to wear their tinfoil hats. But the cute … or scary thing I’ve discovered looking deeper and deeper into this discussion is … take away GPS completely and we still have a huge issue revolving around who can collect data, who should collect the data and what they should be allowed to do with it.
The ALPR(Automated License Plate Recognition) system mentioned in the lead article is nothing more than a camera and character recognition software. At $30K a pop it won’t be in every police car any time soon … but having dealt in the police and public safety marker anything sold to the police at $30K can probably be marketed on the commercial segment for $3K today … and much of the electronics involved is in virtual free-fall as far as price is concerned. So price won’t keep this restricted to known and theoretically trustworthy law enforcement agencies.
Laws? There virtually are none. It’s pretty well established in law that you have no expectation of privacy when you drive on a public road and it’s unlikely there are many local laws or ordinances that make it illegal to photograph cars on a public highway … especially if the faces of the occupants aren’t seen. If I have a file of credit card numbers it’s almost certainly illegal for me to sell them on the open market … but a file of license plate numbers? heck in most states you can buy them from the DMV. A file listing plate numbers passing a given point at a given time? Might not be a hacker’s goldmine but certainly marketable to the right user.
The systems work, too. Look at the results British Columbia is coming up with … an average of 10 cars per hour who are already on someone’s “hit list”. I don’t know the actual stats but I think it would be a pretty lucky and pretty overworked patrol officer to be able to nab 10 cars per hour, 80 per shift.
There are also units with substantially higher processing rates than the 600 per hour quoted here.
Bottom Line? better think long and hard about what data you think should be collected and how you want it handled. Invasive surveillance is already a fact of life and it doesn’t require GPS or RFID or any other overt action on your part to bring yourself into the system. Does your favorite law maker even know about the issue, let alone have legislation in the works to help?
Technorati tags: GPS tracking, surveillance, spying, cameras, ALPR, GPS abuse