Table of contents for GPS Murderer
- A Load Of Bullocks — GPS Tracking Is A Murderer? (Continued — Part 3)
I’m continuing my series based on this recent report, focused mainly on New Zealand and Australia but with world-wide applicability to my readers. The sensational aspect of the report alleges GPS tracking of employees was at least in part to blame for the regrettable suicide of an Australian communications technician … which is where the title came from … but the report also explains how many employers are suing GPS tracing for improved ROI, customer service and even employee safety. I’ll present some facts, and you can be the judge. If you haven’t already done so I highly recommend you read the whole GPS Tracking Drives Employees Over the Edge article, as it is well written and brings up many areas of concern. here are a couple more areas of concern and my opinion, based on real-world experience.
… the level of detail provided by GoFinder’s reports was unnecessary in normal work contexts.
“A missing car can be located without having it self-report continually or even regularly - it just needs to respond when asked,”…
I sincerely hope that the folks who hold these ideas never find themselves upside down in a ditch. I know, I know, this can never happen to you but a hundred thousand or so drivers world-wide each year find out that in the blink of an eye they suddenly have become the “other guy” … the one who always has the accident. In order to be of any real safety value, the GPS tracking must now the vehicle’s location as often as possible.
One of my first government customers had a fleet of over 2,100 vehicles which drove more than 2 million miles per year, often on unimproved roads in remote locations. Equipping the fleet with GPS tracking had been discussed for a number of years until the fateful year when the client suffered three separate fatal accidents involving employees coupled with 13, yes thirteen separate roll-over accidents. Gravel roads, winter blizzard conditions, high winds and driver immaturity were all likely factors.
So the client sprang for and installed a fleet-wide proof of concept test … we installed 300 GPS tracking units on vehicles which the client had identified as his highest risk assets. On the first day that we had any units installed … with full knowledge of the drivers, by the way … the client joined me in the control room where we had the vehicle’s “on screed”. His first comment? “Why do they all seem to be going so fast”?
Well they “seemed” to be going so fast was because they were going so fast. The drivers, over the years, had adopted a unit behavior climate where regulations of the ‘boss’ were translated into the thought of ‘suggestions’ to the drivers. In the first month, by actual measurement, fleet-wide average speed went down 20 miles per hour … yes, that much. I know you think your drivers aren’t this bad … but neither did this man.
The third day the concept test was running a driver hopped in his vehicle for his first trip of the day, gunned it out of it’s gravel parking space, twisted the wheel on a patch of mixed ice and gravel and … yup, you guessed, Wham! upside down in the ditch that bordered the parking area. Of course the antenna for the GPS unit was mounted on the roof. After finding out about the accident via a telephone call from the site, the client arrived in the control room again visibly upset that the accident had not been reported by the GPS. After a cup of coffee and a few minutes conversation the client began to understand why a radio-based device was likely to be rather less than dependable with a 4,000 pound SUV resting atop it in the bottom of a drainage ditch.
What might have happened to the driver had the client followed the somewhat unrealistic suggestion of not tracking the vehicles as they drove and only determining their GPS position when they were obviously overdue? How long would you like to be under a truck in a ditch before someone sent you help?
“Vehicle over-use can be controlled through periodic checks of mileage against travel plans and travel reports.”
Sorry, but this one is patent nonsense. read just a few of my experiences in this line here and here. I can make mileage records show anything you want them to show if it is my intention to deceive you. In addition, another client did some analysis of his labor hours and found out one of his top office assistants spent a minimum of four hours per week on resolving discrepancies between mileage reports turned in by drivers and actual odometer readings made by mechanics when the vehicle’s came in for routine maintenance. How much profit is there to your business in reconciling mileage report discrepancies? Not much I would recon. Why not use a system which automatically reports and put those office assistants and skilled mechanics to work at their highest and best value tasks to help your bottom line?
The owner of a Sydney car rental dealership, who also wished to remain anonymous, said he installed the tracking devices mainly because he charges by the kilometre and some customers abused this by disconnecting the speedometer.
Is anything involving your business profit and loss directly applicable to readings off the odometer? You think that only an infinitesimal percentage of customers would cheat you this blatantly? Well, keep believing it … perhaps wishing will make it so. There are a thousand and one ways a customer can cheat you on mileage … or a customer can abandon the vehicle and leave you the task of finding it. How much net loss on the rental will you have then?
A prospective client in Colorado rented a car to a customer who drove it to Louisiana (in violation of the rental contract, by the way). While driving around in Baton Rouge the car overheated. The customer drove the car to a local repair shop, locked it up and flew home saying nothing to anyone. The client, who had not yet opted to have any units installed, might never have found the car until about 7 days after the car’s return was overdue the owner of the service establishment had a locksmith come and open the car and tracked down my client’s address and phone number via the rental papers. Did the owner of the repair shop call just to be a good guy? Nope. he called to inform my soon-to-be client that there was already an outstanding bill of $100 a day for unauthorized parking as well as $75 dollars for the locksmith plus phone charges. Grrr.
After paying an employee to fly to Louisiana, pay the bills, discover and rectify the cooling problem … 4 days total to get home, my client tracked down and located the original renter and suit in small claims court. The judge’s decision? The renter must pay the client for the original rental fee, the client must absorb the rest of the costs since he had clearly furnished a defective vehicle. Ouch.
Still think it’s smart to ‘save’ the money a GPS tracking system on your rental fleet would cost? Heck, if the repair shop owner hadn’t gone out of his way to collect for his ‘parking fees’ the car might still be in Baton Rouge.